Home / Public paper maps / PaperRESEARCH ARTICLE · International Journal of Technology in Education · 2023
Comparing the Effectiveness of Online, Flipped, and In-Class Critical Thinking Instruction on Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions in Higher Education: Flipped Classroom Produces the Greatest Gains Ali Orhan
Read original paper ↗ See where this research leads. A citation map has not been saved for this paper yet.
The paper record is available below. Preparing a network uses the existing account and source-allowance controls.
Papers that cite this work No saved citation network is available; this does not mean the paper has no citations.
The evidence behind the map Publication record Research article.
Abstract This study aimed to investigate the effect of online, flipped, and in-class critical thinking teaching on critical thinking skills and dispositions of university students. Pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design was employed in this study that has three experimental groups and one control group. In the first experimental group, critical thinking teaching was conducted fully online. In the second experimental group, flipped classroom approach was employed while teaching critical thinking. In the third experimental group, critical thinking teaching was conducted in face-to-face classes. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test and Sosu Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale were used to collect the data. Online, flipped, and in-class explicit critical thinking instructions enhanced university students’ critical thinking skills and dispositions with a large effect. Also, the most effective learning environment to promote critical thinking skills and dispositions was flipped, online, and in-class, respectively.
Coverage and freshness Citation coverage has not been established for this paper.
Counts describe saved source records; repository versions may appear separately. A completed source query is not a complete or live citation census. A citation does not prove endorsement or research quality. Counts depend on publication age and index coverage. Colors identify research areas; positions are for readability.
Source: Saved OpenAlex scholarly metadata. Visits to this public page do not acquire new provider data.
Report a correction 