RESEARCH ARTICLE · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2020

Computational Chemistry-Based Evaluation of Metal Salts and Metal Oxides for Application in Mercury-Capture Technologies

Sean A. Tacey, Tibor Szilvási, James Jay Schauer, Manos Mavrikakis

Read original paper ↗

See where this research leads.

A citation map has not been saved for this paper yet.

Open in your workspace →Open your workspace to prepare the citation network.

The paper record is available below. Preparing a network uses the existing account and source-allowance controls.

Papers that cite this work

No saved citation network is available; this does not mean the paper has no citations.

The evidence behind the map

Publication record

Research article.

Abstract

Anthropogenic mercury emission to the atmosphere adversely affects the environment, wildlife, and human health. Accordingly, the design and implementation of improved mercury-capture technologies have received increased attention. We present a computational chemistry-based screening study to guide the development of mercury-capture materials. We use density functional theory (DFT) to probe the efficacy of metal salts and metal oxides (NaCl, NaBr, KCl, KBr, CaCl 2, CaBr 2, NaNO 3, and MgO) toward mercury capture and their ability to be regenerated for continued use. We focus on three primary sources of mercury emission as elemental gaseous mercury (Hg(0)) or oxidized gaseous mercury species (Hg(II); HgCl 2 or HgBr 2 ): (i) Hg(0) emission from artisanal Au production; (ii) Hg(II)/Hg(0) emission from inlet/outlet streams for flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) operation; and (iii) Hg(0) and Hg(II) emission from cement production. Our results suggest that CaCl 2 and CaBr 2 are good candidates for capturing Hg(0) in artisanal Au production. For FGD operation, KBr, MgO, CaCl 2, and CaBr 2 are good candidates for capturing HgCl 2 and HgBr 2, while CaBr 2 is the only studied material that can capture Hg(0) from the outlet FGD stream. For cement production, CaBr 2 is the only material of those studied that can capture Hg(0), HgCl 2, and HgBr 2 . Our DFT results can accelerate the development of cheap and regenerable mercury-capture materials, as well as better prevent the release of mercury to the environment.

Coverage and freshness

Citation coverage has not been established for this paper.

Counts describe saved source records; repository versions may appear separately. A completed source query is not a complete or live citation census. A citation does not prove endorsement or research quality. Counts depend on publication age and index coverage. Colors identify research areas; positions are for readability.

Source: Saved OpenAlex scholarly metadata. Visits to this public page do not acquire new provider data.

Report a correction