Home / Public paper maps / PaperSee where this research leads. A citation map has not been saved for this paper yet.
The paper record is available below. Preparing a network uses the existing account and source-allowance controls.
Papers that cite this work No saved citation network is available; this does not mean the paper has no citations.
The evidence behind the map Publication record Research article.
Abstract Fossil DNA analysis may become an important source of evidence in Paleoanthropology, in the sense that it may throw light on the inconclusiveness of more traditional evidence that discipline is concerned with (fossil reconstructions, etc.). However, caution is in order: if paleogenetic evidence is not rightly understood, inferences brought to the fore from it could be as ambiguous as the more traditional body of evidence. Our paper makes the point that prudence is required when trying to draw inferences about behavior or cognition from the fossil DNA analysis. We illustrate such a point by discussing the recent discovery of the modern FOPX2 gene version in Neanderthals. Many paleoanthropologists have taken that discovery to be the definitive proof of the existence of complex language in that species. We will aim at showing that the aforementioned inference cannot be automatically established: it is based on a simplistic and reductionist view, which assumes, among many other aspects, that genes are simple causal agents, and that a direct link does exist between genes and characters.
Coverage and freshness Citation coverage has not been established for this paper.
Counts describe saved source records; repository versions may appear separately. A completed source query is not a complete or live citation census. A citation does not prove endorsement or research quality. Counts depend on publication age and index coverage. Colors identify research areas; positions are for readability.
Source: Saved OpenAlex scholarly metadata. Visits to this public page do not acquire new provider data.
Report a correction 