RESEARCH ARTICLE · Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning · 2015

Using Game-Based Learning to Foster Critical Thinking in Student Discourse

Marc I Cicchino

Read original paper ↗

See where this research leads.

A citation map has not been saved for this paper yet.

Open in your workspace →Open your workspace to prepare the citation network.

The paper record is available below. Preparing a network uses the existing account and source-allowance controls.

Papers that cite this work

No saved citation network is available; this does not mean the paper has no citations.

The evidence behind the map

Publication record

Research article.

Abstract

Previous research indicates the importance of student discourse in the construction of knowledge and the fostering of critical thinking skills, especially in the field of problem-based learning (PBL). Further, a growing body of research on game-based learning (GBL) draws parallels between playing certain types of games and the solving of ill-structured problems, citing similar conditions for learning (student centered, small student groups, teachers as facilitators, problems as vehicles for development), and similar learning outcomes (communication, problem-solving, critical thinking, collaboration) as PBL. However, there is a gap in understanding how GBL affects critical thinking as embodied by student discourse when implemented in traditional classroom environments. In this study, I examined student discourse throughout a GBL intervention designed to promote content knowledge and critical thinking in an 8th grade social studies classroom. A total of three 8th grade social studies classes engaged in the intervention. Post-tests and delayed post-tests were conducted for the entire 8th grade (ten social studies classes across two instructors). Five groups of students that engaged in the GBL intervention were videotaped and analyzed. Data analysis showed that features of the GBL intervention and particular cycles of gameplay were effective in promoting higher levels of critical thinking, including the development of independent beliefs prior to engaging in collaborative discourse and providing opportunities for guided reflection. This study has implications for the developers of GBL frameworks, researchers interested in exploring GBL, and teachers seeking to integrate GBL into their classrooms.

Coverage and freshness

Citation coverage has not been established for this paper.

Counts describe saved source records; repository versions may appear separately. A completed source query is not a complete or live citation census. A citation does not prove endorsement or research quality. Counts depend on publication age and index coverage. Colors identify research areas; positions are for readability.

Source: Saved OpenAlex scholarly metadata. Visits to this public page do not acquire new provider data.

Report a correction